Exit to the topic later let it be put forward recently by the U.S. proposal to build on our territory of the so-called. missile defense. Target words, in short, is to be used to destroy ballistic missiles aimed towards the U.S. from the Middle East direction. Details of the U.S. offer no one knows, yet, the government and ALL parties outside of PSL (Pawlak is a big plus for me) present in Parliament, initially declared a willingness to accept the Polish those rockets. This means nothing less than that, even in the event of a change of government after the next election (and this change will, I hope), the current rate will be maintained and the creation of such a shield, anyway. As you can see, all our politicians, regardless of the options represented, confuse subservience to the U.S. with attention to the national interest.
As I said, about what the U.S. will give us nothing in return yet it is not known, but pospekulujmy himself. First of all - the construction of the shield is a huge investment of several billion dollars. It sounds great, but he who thinks that money will reach the Polish contractors is either stupid, or was born yesterday. It is obvious that Americans will not allow the construction of this top-secret installations and strategic priority of foreign companies, even with such włażącego them in the ass country like ours. We, at most, we will provide them with sand and cement.
Jobs? See above. The installation will be secret, labeled the highest security. Besides,
base, like all U.S. bases worldwide, will operate on the principles of extraterritorial
(1) , which will de facto
, the United States of America. Is there really anyone in Rural may believe that the Poles can find work there? Hehehe. Knowing our rulers, probably so ...
Well, maybe offset? Some contracts in exchange for a building permit? It will definitely be talking about this. The air will start to fly huge amounts of dollars, politicians will fade hands and everything and just end up as an offset for the F-16. You will be wydupczeni without soap. And well, because we are fools.
only thing you can count on sure that the abolition of visas to the USA. Hurrah! The problem is that it is a bit too little, and besides those who were eager to go to the U.S. are already there, and the rest apparently did not depend so much on this incredible privilege.
increase security of the country. This is a common argument put forward by supporters of base building. We live in times of terrorism, blah blah blah ... Let me draw attention to the fact that the mere presence of U.S. troops on the territory of a country, does not guarantee security. It's time. Two - I have a feeling that (provided they agree to extend the U.S. missile defense system of the Polish territory
(2) ) to alleviate the missile shield is a threat that creates itself by downloading the our attention to terrorists and other such
(3) .
Thirdly, in the event of any conflict, what do you think will be attacked first? U.S. territory, whether its defense system? It is better to find the a pretty meadow, which, conveniently lying on the grass, you will be able to watch you flying over your head racket ...
Fourth, since we need to seek additional protection, after the hell we are in NATO? Will NATO does not provide sufficient protection to us? And the fundamental question: Protection from what? Because somehow no one wants to clarify his head hanging over our risk. Terrorists? And if NATO missile systems or other gadgets prevented the terrorists in an attack on a country having the most powerful army the world? Will prevent the missile shield planting them in, say, at the Central Station?
attack from Russia? Let's not be ridiculous. Belarus? Moldova? Where this risk, I ask?
And finally, fifth, when the end of the missile, the United States will be completely unpunished. What I'm saying? About this:
and including
But let's start from the beginning. To understand what I mean, we have to go back to the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Then, a group of conservatives gathered around Paul Wolfowitz, began making plans to establish USA as sole superpower in the world and using the disappearance of the traditional enemy, extend their sphere of influence for the entire globe
(4) . Expenditures on armaments, instead of decrease began to grow again.
1997, the same Wolfowitz (now World Bank president, probably as a reward it was), along with other colleagues dissatisfied with Clinton's passive policy (as you can see, the bombing of Yugoslavia during the Kosovo war and the raid on aspirin factory in Sudan was too little for those fettered, right-wing PAL), founded
Foundation The Project for the New American Century . The statute contains a statement of the organization to pursue the objective is to "promote American global leadership" and "shaping the twenty-first century, so that was positive for American principles and interests." According PFNAC, the global dominance of the U.S. is good not only for America but for the whole world (which is every day to convince the Iraqis). The document is full of dangerous phrases similar to my favorite "confrontation with governments hostile to our interests and principles." A bit like Kaczynski. You're either with us - the one with the riot police.
Anyway, when in 2001 Wolfowitz and his colleagues, now known as neoconservatives, grabbed the power, they began to aggressively promote this policy, now called the opening of the "Wolfowitz doctrine." The similarity to the "Brezhnev doctrine" not only in name, unfortunately ... The promotion of this greatly helped the September 11 Osama bin Laden, delivering the ruling government of the world reason to arson and restrictions on the freedoms to their citizens (for example, introduced so far are not revoked, the authorization for eavesdropping ordinary citizens without their knowledge, of course, under the banner of "fighting terror").
apostle of peace and democracy ation
This long historical - political science digression leads us to this day, lit by a great blaze of burning Baghdad. Iraq was attacked under the pretext of combating terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. As we know, weapons of mass destruction have been found, and information about her were fabricated by the Bush administration. The only weapon of mass destruction that Iraq possessed, was destroyed in the 90's
(5) and came from programs sponsored by the U.S. during the Iraq war - Iran, when Saddam and Reagan (the spiritual father of neo-conservatives) they ate each of the beaks. The theory of cooperation Hussein and Al Qaeda still less hold the water. I remind you that Hussein's regime was a secular regime, hated by all the Arabs from mudżehadinami and other fanatics at the helm. Besides, just common sense - Saddam, it was a dictator. Show me a dictator, who will share the strength and resources of the organization, which could harm the religious fanaticism of his influence. Sooner will use the army to expel them from the country than to train on their territory competing forces. Nonsense some.
Repeating that the war in Iraq is a war for oil makes no sense. That is obvious. But war is also designed to show the true power of the U.S. Army and, in accordance with the doctrine of Wolfowitz, letting go of the world Uploaded: podskakujcie not, because you will end up like Iraq. And one more thing: look at the map. Location of U.S. bases in Iraq will allow United to exercise control over the entire region. Control over oil. A small step for man, one giant leap for neo-conservative global lust for power and control.
Point terrorist
Policy U.S. foreign spillover them a lot of enemies. No wonder that they seek all means to protect themselves against the wrath of the world. Question: we have an interest in, to help them? Through our participation in the coalition dropped our security, cheap oil is not flowing streams, our company did not get the promised contracts to rebuild Iraq after the war. Ass. As usual. But we are like politicians signature. Mediocre, passive but loyal. Until the end. For free. Because only the pedals admit to mistakes.
status for today is this: in Iraq is in chaos. The government does not rule. Coalition forces have proved unable to establish order. On the streets last regular religious war, shaping a new order, which has no place in western democracy. After leaving the Americans, and someday will have to leave, Iraq will become another fundamentalist religious state. This whole mess was started by a short-sighted, selfish and imperialistic thinking politicians, the U.S. and other coalition countries (including Kwasniewski and Miller Szmajdziński). To them falls the responsibility for blood, death and tears of the Iraqi people.
after bomb attack on a marketplace in Baghdad Since the entry of coalition forces in Iraq, were killed instantly, according to various estimates, from 10,000 to 40,000 thousands of civilians. Women walking to the market for shopping. Children in school. Shopkeepers, civil servants and students. Normal people like you and me ... Medical journal The Lancet estimated
that the likelihood of violent death in Iraq has increased 58 times since the U.S. invasion. Hussein's regime was terrible but the freedom, equality and democracy in the barrels zaniesione coalition forces appear to be 58 times worse. Applaud these gentlemen ...
Accelerated Course of Western standards of democracy In light of this, we must ask ourselves a serious question. Do we want to continue to take part in this unjust, pirate war? Do you still want to work with the U.S., sign the same under their vision of the world, and legitimizing their push for global hegemony? Consent for anti-missile shield will be yet another confirmation that Poland is nothing else but a "Trojan donkey America," as someone once described us in Europe. Are we willing to trade away our honor for several million dollars and U.S. visa?
Here there are three arguments in support of my sentence:
Not in my name! 
Most people have a problem with the access that is funny (apart form) in this regard. Good luck:) 
apostle of peace and democracy ation 
Point terrorist 
after bomb attack on a marketplace in Baghdad 
Accelerated Course of Western standards of democracy 
Yes. Aerated church. Pretty and practical to maintain. In the case of an attack on the forces known to our country, pull out the stopper, we make and kitramy in a safe place, thereby avoiding the costs associated with the eventual reconstruction and minimizing the risk of desecration of holiness. Another benefit is that after filling with helium and clinging trash, Inflatable Temple of Divine Providence could balloon to serve as the strategic bombing of gays, feminists and Owsiakowego Woodstock. 
interior spacious enough to accommodate the modesty of our famous of all Polish authorities or complying with the Christian principles. 
